Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />L� <br />Attorney Henderson stated that he is not withdrawing <br />the request; he is saying that they are not going to present <br />testimony in support of the present rate request which needs <br />amending. Instead of thinking in terms of reapplying, his <br />recommendation was that we continue the process of submit- <br />ting a revised rate schedule to staff and proceed to a final <br />order and final hearing. He stressed, however, that his <br />client is not willing to wait until December for a final <br />hearing. <br />The audience reacted loudly to this statement. <br />Attorney Brandenburg recommended that the Commission <br />proceed according to the Utility Director's outline and then <br />have staff do an analysis and present an order. <br />Attorney Henderson reiterated that they have no <br />testimony in support of the present rate request. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if the information previously <br />received from Breezy Village Water & Sewer Company can be <br />received in evidence. Attorney Brandenburg confirmed that <br />it could. <br />Attorney Henderson asked that their application be <br />admitted into the record. <br />Staff memo re the above application is as follows, and <br />the Exhibits listed are on file in the Office of the Clerk: <br />M <br />MaY 21984 _ <br />BOOK 56 FACE 895 <br />