5/2/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

comes in twice a week to check on the water*and sewer plant, which he pays $2400. Mr. Pollard contended that the management fee also should be figured on the same basis, i.e., two days a month, and should be $260 not $2600. Mr. Pollard then challenged auto expense, noting that BVA pays for the gasoline from Miami and Fort Lauderdale and Mr. Wilson charges mileage on top of that, and then he charges $1,040 to the water and sewer plant for mileage. When Mr.Wilson is in the subdivision, the time is divided between water and sewer and BVA, and Mr. Pollard felt there is a double dip there. Mr. Pollard next stated that the residents know that Mr. Wilson doesn't pay payroll taxes; he has said so; and while the amount shown for payroll taxes is only $47.00, there is a principle involved and the figure should be zero. Mr. Pollard claimed that the statement of income for 1982 is false, and he felt it should be disqualified from the exhibit. Mr. Pollard then summed up his earlier comments on Page 5, Exhibit B, stating that they would not accept many of these figures unless they were audited. Chairman Scurlock asked that a copy of the Court Order referred to earlier be made a part of the record. Mr. Pollard stated that he will make it available, but he felt Attorney Henderson had objected to this. The Chairman and Commissioner Wodtke believed that what Attorney Henderson had objected to was the editorializing by Mr. Pollard. Mr. Pollard then went on to discuss discrepancies in meter readings and overcharges, claiming that the overcharges were made by Mr. Wilson with forethought as proved by two letters written in 1979 to Phil Tumolo giving instruction on how to read the meters and how to price them. To demonstrate his claim of incorrect billing, Mr. Pollard submitted Exhibit "N", Page 1 and 2, as follows: 114 MAY 2 1984 BOOK 56 PAGE 913