Laserfiche WebLink
_I <br />MAY 2 3 1994 <br />BOOK 5 `FAG€ 245 <br />The Board continued to talk about building another <br />facility and planning for the future and agreed that we must <br />comply with the master plan. <br />DISCUSSION - RELATION OF SEBASTIAN R/W's TO THOROUGHFARE <br />PLAN <br />Chairman Scurlock noted that the Transportation <br />Planning Committee has worked hard to develop our Thorough- <br />fare Plan, and feels we must impress on the City of <br />Sebastian the importance of keeping certain rights-of-way <br />open for future implementation of our Thoroughfare Plan. <br />Commissioner Lyons confirmed that the Transportation <br />Planning Committee discussed the County Road 512 corridor; <br />they also discussed sale of the railroad right-of-way <br />parallel to 512. In addition, they discussed with the <br />Sebastian representative the importance of maintaining the <br />right-of-way for SR 512 because we look at that as being <br />another Highway 60 in the future. It was suggested there <br />might be a possibility we might want to hold a joint meeting <br />with the Sebastian City Council in this regard. <br />Commissioner Bird inquired what the threat to the road <br />is, and Commissioner Lyons explained that they are not <br />leaving enough clearance on where they are allowing <br />buildings to be erected and we are going to have to buy some <br />more right-of-way somewhere along the line. <br />Attorney Brandenburg clarified that the City of <br />Sebastian is not honoring our Thoroughfare Plan and are <br />allowing improvements to be built within the future <br />right-of-ways anticipated in our Thoroughfare Plan. <br />Apparently, their attorney has given them the opinion that <br />they cannot require a larger setback. Attorney Brandenburg <br />stated that he would like to request the Commission to allow <br />him to address a letter to the City Council of Sebastian <br />requesting them to honor our Thoroughfare Plan and also send <br />82 <br />® � r <br />