My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/6/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
6/6/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:24 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:26:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/06/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />Commissioner Lyons inquired what the term "beach _ _ <br />trimming" means, and OMB Director Barton explained that it <br />involves taking a bulldozer out about 3' into the ocean and <br />pulling the sand back on the dune line. He noted that the <br />State of Florida does not consider this acceptable practice <br />and will not permit it. <br />In discussion, the Board members noted that the County <br />already has established a policy in regard to requiring dune <br />cross -overs, dune vegetation, etc., and about the only thing <br />we have not done is make the construction setback line more <br />restrictive than the State's. <br />Since no representative of the Taxpayers Association <br />was present, the Chairman accepted their letter to be made <br />part of the record and asked Commissioner Wodtke, Chairman <br />of the Beach Restoration and Preservation Committee, to <br />report on the committee's recommendation. <br />Commissioner Wodtke reported that a special meeting of <br />the Beach Restoration and Preservation Committee was called <br />after receipt of the phone call from Congressman Nelson. <br />The Congressman had felt there was a commitment the project <br />would be done and.that all that remained to be decided was <br />how to raise the funds. If there was to be a referendum for <br />or against the project, he could not recommend including the <br />project in this year's appropriations budgets. This could <br />set us back severely or even entirely eliminate the project <br />from consideration. <br />Commissioner Wodtke continued that our staff has worked <br />diligently with City representatives and officials studying <br />various alternatives for funding the project, i.e., what the <br />cost would be if it were to be paid for by all the taxpayers <br />in the county on a uniform basis through ad valorem tax, if <br />the City assumed a certain level of participation, if an <br />MSTU could be set up etc., and whatever form was looked at, <br />it seemed we were looking at a 60/40 or possibly a 70/30 <br />80 <br />JUN 6 1984 BOOK 5 A FA,E 375 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.