Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Bird explained to Mrs. Eddy that based on <br />the Motion that is on the floor, she can go ahead and use <br />the part of her property that is zoned C-1, but if she wants <br />to use the portion that is zoned R-1 as commercial, she <br />would have to come in with a rezoning request. If she feels <br />that the 300' or so of commercial is adequate, she might not <br />want to rezone the property in the rear, but she always <br />could come back and request that at a later date. <br />Mrs. Eddy asked if she would have to come up with more <br />money, and it was explained only if she came in with a <br />rezoning request. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />Commissioner Wodtke stated that a point he wished to <br />bring up was the desirability of being able to address the <br />rezoning at the same time as a redesignation so the <br />applicant would not have to come back with a new application <br />requiring additional staff time, a rehearing, etc. <br />Director Keating noted that in many instances staff <br />will recommend the applicant also apply for a rezoning at <br />the same time. However, in some cases, the applicant simply <br />neglects to do so. <br />Planner Shearer noted that if the CLUP would require a <br />rezoning, staff gives the applicant a rezoning application <br />and informs them of the procedures so that these can be <br />considered simultaneously. However, when someone requests a <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment that staff does not feel will <br />be approved, they do not encourage the applicant to apply <br />for the rezoning at the same time because of the cost in- <br />volved. Mr. Shearer brought up the possibility of consid- <br />ering a change in the fee schedule if both procedures were <br />handled at the same time. <br />35 <br />L_ JUN 61984 <br />Boa 57 FACE 29 1 <br />