My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/11/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
7/11/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:24 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:30:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/11/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 111984 <br />BOOK 57 PAGE 609 <br />TO: The Honorable Members DATE: June 26, 1984 FILE: <br />of the Board of County <br />Commissioners <br />WHITESTONE REQUEST TO <br />INCLUDE 28.91 ACRES IN <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE- THE 150 ACRE U.S.#1 <br />8UBJECT: AND WABASSO ROAD <br />COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL <br />NODE <br />Robert M. Keati , WP <br />Planning & Development Director <br />FROM. Richard Shearer AICP REFERENCES: Whitestone/P&Z <br />Chief, Long -Range Planning CHIEF <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their <br />regular meeting of July 11, 1984. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS <br />The applicant, Domenic Mirabile, an agent for Kenneth <br />Whitestone, Trustee; is requesting to include 28.91 acres <br />located one-half mile north of Wabasso Road and on the west <br />side of the F.E.C. Railroad in the 150 acre U.S.#1 and Wabasso <br />Road commercial/industrial node. <br />The subject.property is currently zoned M-1, Restricted <br />Industrial District, and A. Agricultural District. The <br />applicants originally intended to establish a septage <br />processing facility. 'Currently, the applicants are intending <br />to use the subject property for industrial uses. <br />On May 24, 198.4, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted <br />4 -to -0 to recommend that the subject property not be included <br />in the node. The Commission felt that the County has spent <br />considerable time developing the node concept,and they did not <br />feel that the subject property could logically be included in <br />the node. _• <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the <br />application -will be presented. The analysis will include a <br />description.of the current and future land uses of the site and <br />surrounding areas, potential impacts on the transportation and <br />utility systems, and any significant adverse impacts on <br />environmental quality. <br />Existina Land Use Pattern <br />The subject property and all of the land. immediately around it <br />is undeveloped. East of -the subject property, across the <br />F.E.C. railroad, are citrus groves, cultivated land, and vacant <br />land. Further east, fronting on U.S.#1, is the Hale Groves <br />office and gift shop, and a motel. <br />Future Land Use Pattern <br />The Comprehensive Plan designates approximately 19 acres of the <br />subject property as LD -2, Low -Density Residential 2 (up to 6 <br />units/acre), and the remaining portion (the east 300 feet of the <br />property) is designated MXD, Mixed -Use District (up to 6 <br />units/acre). <br />W <br />� s � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.