My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/11/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
7/11/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:24 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:30:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/11/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J U L 1.1. 1994 <br />8001( 57 FADE 671 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the <br />Board unanimously (4-0) appointed the <br />members as recommended by Chairman Scurlock <br />to the Economic Development Committee, with the <br />terms of each to be decided at a later date. <br />REQUEST FOR PAVING OF 10th COURT SOUTH OF OSLO ROAD <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/2/84: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: <br />the Board of County Commissioners July 2, 1984 FILE: <br />THROUGH: Michael Wright, <br />County Administrator <br />SUBJECT: Request for Paving - 10th Court <br />South of Oslo Road by Oslo <br />Concerned City�ens League <br />FROM: James W. Davis, P . E. REFERENCES: <br />Public Works Direct0 <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />In the past 4 years, the Public Works Division has received <br />Road Maintenance/Paving requests from the Gifford area, the Oslo <br />area, and similar areas where subdivisions were created over <br />a long period of time by metes and bounds description. In such <br />areas, a proper road right-of-way does not exist, and the residents <br />do not have the financial capability of bearing the cost of funding <br />750 of the cost of road improvements as required by the petition <br />paving program, under a 2 -year assessment plan. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />In considering a policy to address this problem staff recognizes <br />the following unique circumstances. <br />1) the existing road is not in an established right-of-way. <br />2) there are a substantial number of homes fronting the road <br />most of which were not recently constructed (prior to <br />-1973). <br />3) the area is a low income area where residents are not <br />financially capable of meeting the financial obligations <br />of the petition paving program, as it now exists. <br />For three years, staff has been working with the residents <br />of two residential streets to solve this problem. These streets <br />are <br />10th Court S.W. from Oslo Road South to 11th Court S.W. <br />34th Avenue North Gifford Road to 47th Street. <br />63 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.