My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/1/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
8/1/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:25 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:32:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/01/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SCOPE OF SERVICES - BIENNIAL SANITARY LANDFILL REPORT <br />Utility Services Director Terry Pinto reviewed the <br />following memo: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of theDATE: July 24, 1984 FILE: <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />THROUGH: Michael Wright <br />County Administrator SPECIFIC SERVICES ADDENDUM <br />SUBJECT: FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE <br />1984 BIENNIAL SANITARY <br />LANDFILL MANAGEMENT REPORT <br />FROM:Ter anc Pinto REFERENCES',) Scope o Letter 7/12/84 <br />Utility Services Director •a) Scope of Services <br />b) Specific Services Addendum <br />c) Bond Requirement Section 0 <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />Attached as Exhibit "1" is a letter from Post, Buckley, Schuh, and_ <br />Jernigan, Inc. They have submitted a scope of services (Exhibit <br />"a") and a specific services addendum (Exhibit "b") for the 1984 <br />biennial sanitary landfill management report for the County's <br />approval and signature. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSES: <br />The only alternative is to go out for bid to other engineers to <br />provide this service. At this time, staff does not recommend this. <br />The biennial sanitary landfill management report is a requirement <br />of our Solid Waste Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Series 1977, <br />Section 0 (Exhibit <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends the Board authorize its Chairman to sign the specific <br />services addendum and approve the scope of services as stated in <br />Exhibit "a". <br />Chairman Scurlock inquired about interviewing other <br />engineering firms as he wished to be sure we continued to <br />make this a competitive situation; otherwise, firms tend to <br />escalate their prices. <br />Director Pinto explained that staff feels it is best to <br />keep the original consultant at this time since we are going <br />through some difficulties in the final permitting stages for <br />the closeout of this cell. When we go into the next cell, <br />however, he believed we then would go into competitive <br />interviews. <br />14 <br />AUG 1 1984 BOOK 1 7 Fa,r X19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.