Laserfiche WebLink
AUG 9 1994 BOOK 57 Fr�cF 38 <br />Commissioner Wodtke thought that it doesn't seem fair <br />when one individual has to pay for the line and the others <br />do not, but he did not know that we have any alternatives. <br />Director Pinto stressed that if the County forced them <br />to put in the 6" line, then we could consider the difference <br />in cost, but these people were not forced; they had other <br />options. <br />Administrator Wright explained that what they are <br />asking the Board to do today is to reaffirm the policy that <br />a 6" line is the minimum waterline. <br />Commissioner Lyons did not have any problem with a 6" <br />line, but he thought that we were going to set up some sort <br />of policy that would encourage the use of County water in <br />Oslo Park Subdivision and he agreed with Commissioner Wodtke <br />that it was unfair for the first one in to have to pay the <br />entire cost. <br />Commissioner Wodtke suggested that we include this <br />matter to be discussed at the line extension workshop <br />scheduled for later this month. <br />Attorney Brandenburg felt this situation is no <br />different than someone who needs to build a road to get to <br />his property and the road goes by people who don't want a <br />road or don't want to pay for a road since all their land is <br />in groves. <br />Chris Ekonomou advised that the value of lots on their <br />street have gone from $4,000 to $15,000 due to the waterline <br />being installed. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board <br />unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Bird having <br />left the meeting) agreed to remain with the <br />County's 6" pipe policy; with the understanding <br />that until we have a different set of rules <br />any individual who wishes to install a waterline <br />51 <br />