Laserfiche WebLink
process of addressing the expansion of this node should be <br />started immediately, however. <br />Attorney Henderson stated that either solution is all <br />right with his clients; just so they have the assurance that <br />they can safely move ahead with their plans. <br />Nancy Offutt, speaking as liaison for the Board of <br />Realtors, just wished to say that the dilemma faced by <br />Attorney Henderson's clients typifies what the Board is <br />facing with the uncertainty of the node. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously <br />closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Lyons stated that he would like a Motion <br />that would allow the applicants to use their property as <br />currently zoned and call it consistent with the Plan. <br />Attorney Brandenburg noted that the Commission can <br />designate that 58 acres as being part of the already <br />existing node, but the Planning Director does not feel that <br />is logical.' Another option is to deny their request to be <br />included in the node and utilize the provision he read from <br />the Comprehensive Plan with the overriding view that at the <br />time the nodal system is restructured, this property would <br />be included in the new boundaries. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bowman, to deny the request of <br />Indian River Industrial Associates to be included <br />in the Commercial/Industrial Node at SR 60 and I-95 <br />and ask that this property be considered under the <br />statement found on Page 34 of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />31 <br />AUG 2 2 1984 <br />BOOK 58 FADE 67 <br />