Laserfiche WebLink
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />On August 9, 1984,, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved <br />a site plan application for Royale Garden Village, a proposed <br />shopping center and restaurant complex. Located on the east <br />side of U.S. 1 immediately south of the South Relief Canal, the <br />project site is currently occupied by the WAXE radio station <br />and transmitting tower. The property is 2.98 acres in size, is <br />zoned C-1, Commercial District, and presently supports an <br />approved commercial use. <br />The applicant, John Lyon, has proposed a 16,850 square foot <br />retail center and a 5,495 square foot restaurant for the site. <br />As proposed,. the commercial facility would gain access from <br />U.S. #1 via two 21 foot one-way drives and be served by a 22 <br />foot perimeter belt drive. The number of parking spaces would <br />exceed those required. The stormwater management plan, the <br />landscape plan, and the utilities plan all meet County <br />regulations and have been approved. The site is surrounded by <br />multi -family residential on both the east and south, while it <br />is bounded by the South Relief Canal on the north and the U.S. <br />#1 right-of-way and F.E.C. Railroad right-of-way on the west. <br />On August 20,. 1984, Mr. J. E. Luckett, President of the Vista <br />Royale Association, formally appealed the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission's- approval of the Royal Garden Village site plan <br />application. In his appeal letter, written on behalf of the <br />Vista Royale Association, Mr. ,Luckett cited three principal <br />factors which support his position. Mr. Luckett feels that the <br />approved site plan does not provide for adequate access and <br />circulation of vehicles; he contends that the site plan does <br />not ensure' adequate safety and convenience for the public. <br />Second, he charges that the site plan does not provide adequate <br />protection and separation.for contiguous and nearby residential <br />property. Finally, Mr. Luckett states that the approved site <br />plan does not conform to the Land Use Element of the County's <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:. <br />Subsequent'to submittal of the initial site plan application <br />for the.Royale Garden Village project, the staff worked closely <br />with agents for the applicant to secure modifications to the <br />proposed site plan, modifications which would reduce or elimi- <br />nate potential problems identified by the staff. Among the <br />issues identified by the staff and adequately addressed by the <br />applicant were access to the site, internal circulation, <br />removal of the existing radio tower, adequate provision for <br />wastewater treatment$ and establishment of a buffer between the <br />proposed retail center and the adjacent multi -family struc- <br />tures. Since each of these issues was adequately addressed by <br />the applicant prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />meeting at which the proposed project was to be considered, the <br />staff recommended approval of.the site plan application. <br />Upon receipt of a, site plan application, one of the first <br />factors considered* by the staff is the site's present zoning <br />and land use designation. In this case, the staff found that <br />the subject property was zoned C-1 .and had a land -use desig- <br />nation of 'MD -2, medium density residential. Because the <br />property contained a lawfully conforming commercial use that <br />was established prior to adoption of the Land Use Element of <br />the Comprehensive Plan and because the Plan states that the <br />purpose of the Plan is not to create non -conformities and, <br />therefore, any lawfully conforming use existing at the time of <br />Plan adoption would be considered consistent with the Plan, the <br />53 <br />SEP 19 1994 Bou 58 PnUE-375 <br />I <br />