Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 2 6 <br />1984 <br />BOOK <br />$ <br />L,4 r 444 <br />would draw people from other areas. <br />The Attorney <br />felt <br />traffic at the intersection would have to increase. <br />Planner Shearer agreed that obviously there will be <br />more trips, but staff is hoping trips that originate on the <br />island will not have to go to the mainland, and this will <br />keep them off the bridge. He continued to discuss traffic <br />and how it depends on what activities are allowed at this <br />location. <br />Commissioner Lyons agreed there would be more conveni- <br />ence for shopping but it would be at the expense of peace <br />and tranquility. He pointed out that the people who bought <br />the condos to the south, bought them without having any <br />shopping there, and it may be that we were presumptuous in <br />the Master Plan when we showed a node there. <br />Further discussion ensued as to moving the commercial <br />away from the intersection, and Commissioner Wodtke felt <br />through site plan approval it might be possible to handle <br />the traffic internally and have exits on both AlA and 510 <br />even with the commercial being located further south. He <br />felt it is a shame we don't have PUD so the residents can <br />see what is being proposed and we could make a contractual <br />agreement. <br />Traffic Engineer Orr agreed, but noted we can't do that <br />at this time and we have no assurance what will happen to <br />that property. <br />Attorney Brandenburg brought up the criteria for curb <br />cuts on arterial roads and wished to know if this has been <br />considered since this actually is quite a small piece of <br />property. <br />Traffic Engineer Orr did not feel that poses a major <br />problem; although, he agreed it would be best to put those <br />cuts at the extreme ends of the lots. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard. <br />J <br />30 <br />