9/26/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOOK 58 F�.�E 448 Commissioner Bird wished to know if the site plan for the 17 acres on the southeast side of the intersection is still valid, and if it encompasses the whole 17 acres. Planning Director Keating informed the Board that a site plan for a hotel with a number of independent struc- tures, such as villas, was approved. He believed that it did encompass the entire 17 acres; a building permit was secured and has been kept active. He did tell them, however, that if sufficient construction was not maintained to show a good faith effort, the site plan could be revoked. Attorney Brandenburg believed the it is one of the villas they have started to construct. He confirmed that our new ordinance requires that continuous construction be maintained, and if it is not for a six month period, then the building permit and zoning permit and site plans all expire. This, however, would not preclude them from coming in and asking for an amended site plan to use some of that commercial property for another purpose. Commissioner Wodtke asked when we are going to have our own version of PUD, and Planning Director Keating stated that it still is in workshop. Even after PRD is approved, however, it won't allow a contractual rezoning situation. The way it is structured, it would be a special exception use and you would have to have the underlying zoning in place at the time. Attorney Brandenburg clarified that on a special exception approval, you can place conditions on a project that you cannot normally; you don't actually enter into a contract, but can place your concerns as conditions. Commissioner Bird stated that he had mixed feelings. He sympathized with the residents of Summerplace, and after spending six years on the Planning & Zoning Commission and four years on the County Commission, he was very aware that we have not wanted a prokliferation of commercial on the 34