My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/26/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
9/26/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:26 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:49:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/26/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SEP 2 6 1984 BOOK 5- Pri � -450 <br />Mr. Chason pointed out to the Board that Vero Beach <br />Trading Corp. came to the Commission on the basis of moving <br />the commercial to the corner, and he did not want all the <br />commercial taken away from them. He believed the Comprehen- <br />sive Plan has said the node is on the corner, and his <br />question is where those 25 acres go? <br />Commissioner Lyons informed Mr. Chason that his next <br />Motion would be to ask the Planning Department to revisit <br />that corner with the node and see whether there should be <br />any node there at all. <br />Attorney Brandenburg clarified that the County <br />Commission has today been presented with issues that raise <br />questions in their mind as the extent of the commercial that <br />should be at this location. <br />Mr. Chason continued to emphasize that he came before <br />the Board only to move the commercial he already has from <br />one point to another. <br />Chairman Scurlock again explained that the full <br />decision won't be made today. There is one motion on the <br />floor to deny the rezoning on Parcel 1; it appears there <br />will be another motion to authorize staff to initiate a <br />County rezoning of the subject property, the C-1, at which <br />point another full public hearing would be held with full <br />input, and possibly a third motion would be for the planning <br />staff to revisit and reconsider the 25 acre node with the <br />possibility of either reducing it or eliminating it. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION on <br />the Motion to deny rezoning on Parcel 1. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />Chairman Scurlock then opened the public hearing on the <br />rezoning of Parcel 2 to R -2D and asked if anyone present <br />wished to be heard. There were none. <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.