Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Cliburn addressed the recommendations from staff <br />point by point, stating that their first qualification would <br />be the rephrasing of the first sentence of Section 14. He <br />confirmed that the staff and the utility have basically <br />agreed to remove the words "as approved" from the section <br />that reads - "The rates charged by the Company for its <br />service hereunder shall be fair and reasonable and designed <br />to meet all necessary costs of the service, including a fair <br />rate of return on an approved rate base under efficient and <br />economical management." <br />Mr. Cliburn continued that the next recommendation in <br />the memo of Mrs. Hamilton, dated September 17,'related to <br />the payment of the 6% franchise fee, and they have no <br />problem either with the verbiage or the method by which they <br />would pay the quarterly franchise fee or with stating said <br />franchise fee on the utility bill. <br />Mr. Cliburn then addressed the items in the memo writ- <br />ten by Assistant Utility Director Baird, "Exhibit B", as <br />follows: <br />Item 1 - He agreed to remove any reference in the Service <br />Availability and Main Extension Policy to the Florida Public <br />Service Commission and insert where appropriate Indian River <br />County Board of County Commissioners. <br />Item 2 - Section 1.0 General Policy: Mr. Cliburn stated <br />that they have agreed the general policy would be as stated <br />in the remainder of the same and what they probably would <br />do, would be send to the Utilities Division a procedure by <br />which they would determine the economic feasibility or <br />consider extending service. <br />Item 3 - Section 3.0 (Plant Capacity) Charge: Mr. Cliburn <br />stated that the $388 per ERU verbiage would be changed so <br />that $388 would not be specified but it would state that the <br />impact fee is paid directly to Indian River County and is <br />subject to change. <br />63 <br />SEP 26 1984 <br />Bou 58 FacE 477 <br />