Laserfiche WebLink
Fr - <br />BOOK 58 WWF 8"'?9 <br />(c) Routine repairs accepted at $987 per year. Chlorinator scales are <br />capital items not maintenance and should come out of R & R account. <br />Air compressor should come out of R and R account. Pipe and fittings <br />accepted. Blower unit is a capital expense , not maintenance. Detecto <br />scale is a capital expense not a maintenance item. Sewage pond cleaning <br />Is a maintenance item. Mowing is included in plant operator expense. <br />Therefore, total of accepted repair items: <br />Routine $ 987 <br />Pipe and fittings 455 <br />Total $1,442 <br />Amortized over three (3) years= 48� 0.67 <br />(d) Rate case expense shown is considered excessive. The PSC has indicated <br />the historical allowance for small utility rate case expenses is <br />approximately $25 - $30 per connection. This allowance has been <br />supported by rulings of the First District Court of Appeals. Therefore, <br />allowing the high end of accepted ranges, recommend allowance of <br />$30 per connection as a rate case expense which is: <br />87 connections x $30/connection = $2,610 <br />Amortized over two (2) years = $1,305 <br />We have now presented a revised rate base and operation maintenance expense <br />calculation. Based on the revised rate base and expense calculations, we <br />propose a rate structure which would consist of a base facilities charge <br />which represents fixed costs per connection and a variable cost charge which <br />is associated with the cost per one thousand (1,000) gallons of water and <br />sewer service sold. As all water meters are 5/8"x3/4", we are only showing <br />a calculation for one meter size. If the structure needs to be expanded, <br />we recommend using the factors recommended by the American Water Works Association <br />to set rates at different meter sizes. The following is our rate calculation <br />based on our revised rate base and expense summary. <br />On page 11, which is a summarization of operation and <br />maintenance expenses, Mr. Robbins pointed out that he is of the <br />opinion that the depreciation that has been requested by the <br />Utility as an expense should be zero for the purpose of rate <br />making because IRC requires the customers of the system to fund a <br />renewal and replacement account of 2% of the preceding year's <br />gross revenues. Since depreciation is used as an expense to <br />cover worn out capital assets, he felt it is unfair that the <br />customers pay depreciation to the Utility and also pay 20 renewal <br />and replacement expenses on top of that. There should be some <br />money set aside for continuity of service, which explains their <br />zero line item for depreciation. It is their opinion that the <br />Utility has been very poorly maintained and it is not the <br />responsibility of the customers to fund these repairs. It is also <br />their feeling that capital items should not be included as <br />maintenance. <br />26 <br />L�� <br />