My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/15/2015 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2015
>
09/15/2015 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2024 1:46:33 PM
Creation date
11/23/2015 11:55:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
09/15/2015
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fortune Magazine, June 4, 2015 <br />How do trains stack up environmentally to other modes of travel? Better than you might <br />think <br />You can talk all you want about Teslas, but when it comes to overall energy efficiency, <br />Amtrak beats other modes of transport hands down. According to the U.S. Department <br />of Transportation, trains are dramatically more efficient per passenger mile than autos <br />and air travel. And as a general rule, trains are also considerably more energy-efficient <br />than buses, while emitting less damaging compounds into the air. Amtrak's electrified <br />trains in the Northeast corridor are better fuel misers than its diesels and can feed <br />energy captured from regenerative braking back to the electrical grid. <br />Traveling by train, however, is on the pricey side, costing on average 314 per passenger <br />mile, compared with 13t for flying. But going by rail is a steal compared with driving the <br />family sedan, which costs a whopping 614 a mile. <br />g�a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.