Laserfiche WebLink
N O V 21 199 <br />members of the Property Owners Association, and he would like to <br />see others on the committee. <br />Chairman Scurlock agreed there should be representatives <br />from all of the community. <br />7) How much of the cost of the MSTU is defrayed by the <br />County? <br />Mr. Davis stated that the County has not provided any direct <br />contribution to any MSTU in the county. Indirectly, he felt <br />there will be a great contribution involving a lot of staff time, <br />and maintenance will continue. <br />The Chairman emphasized that we need to be absolutely sure <br />that we keep the level of service we are providing uniform, and <br />we are not providing this vehicle to abolish any service we are <br />providing now. <br />8) When is it envisioned that 101st Ave. and 87th St. would <br />be paved and what type of roads? <br />Director Davis felt instead of waiting until the revenue has <br />been received to do the total length of these roads, we should <br />break it into sections beginning at CR 510 and 512 and do a <br />section a year - 1/2 a mile or so. At that rate, it could be <br />finished in six or seven years. <br />Chairman Scurlock noted that there is the option of bonding <br />this project, but pointed out that it would be necessary to look <br />at the total cost of the property and how many years they would <br />want to fund it over. <br />Mr. Johnson personally felt the entire thing should be done. <br />In regard to the type of road for this area, Mr. Davis felt <br />"double surface" treatment wearing surface would be adequate. It <br />is less expensive; it has been used in the County before; and it <br />is holding up quite well. It would be a basically 22' wide road <br />with swale drainage. <br />Joe McBride, 9225 87th St., inquired about the two mill cap <br />and wished to know who will decide this. <br />46 <br />