Laserfiche WebLink
Commission office. He recommended the board move forward on approving the <br /> rezoning request. <br /> The Applicant, Bruce Barkett, waived his presentation and explained that <br /> the application is consistent with the approved site plan. <br /> ON MOTION BY Dr. Day, SECONDED BY Ms. <br /> Caldarone, the members voted unanimously (6-0) to <br /> approve the recommendation for rezoning with the <br /> conditions set forth in the staff's recommendation <br /> to the Board of County Commissioners. <br /> Chairma Polackwich read the following into the r ord: <br /> B. Consid ation of Proposed Parking Reg ations for Vacation Rentals <br /> ("Ordina e 1"); Amending Land Develo 'ent Regulations Chapters 901 <br /> (Definition 911 (Zoning), and 9 (Single-Family Development) <br /> [Legislativ <br /> Mr. Boling pres ted a PowerPoi presentation, a copy of which is on file <br /> in the Commission o 1 He discus , d the fact that in 2011, the State pre- <br /> empted local government gulations� egarding vacation rentals and the Board of <br /> County Commissioners ad ted a de change in 2012 specifying that vacation <br /> rentals are treated the same s conventional residences. Since that time, Code <br /> Enforcement has received se al complaints regarding parking and the BCC <br /> directed staff to initiate the ad on process for special parking regulations for <br /> vacation rentals. In addition, Sh Term Vacation Rental Advisory Committee <br /> was established in July 2015 <br /> Mr. Boling went on t review Prop sed Ordinance #1, clarifying that it does <br /> not change existing parki g allowances fo conventional residences. For vacation <br /> rentals, parking would ' limited to the n• ber of carport/garage spaces plus <br /> one space per bedroo ��not to exceed five paces outside. For rentals with no <br /> carport/garage, parkin would be limited to o spaces plus one space per <br /> bedroom, not to ex ,teed five spaces outside. There was also a provision for <br /> "excess spaces" forilarger parcels. He pointed ut some of the concerns from <br /> "interested parties" us far. <br /> Chairman olackwich voiced his concern with`~;the ordinance regarding the <br /> definition of "va tion rental", particularly when the h`bmeowner also lives in the <br /> residence. The homeowner wouldn't have the same\parking privileges as his <br /> neighbor when er he's living in his home. <br /> PZC/Approved 5 August 13, 2015 <br /> F:\BCCINII Committees\P&Z\2015—AGENDAS & MINUTES\P&Z-08-13-15.doc <br /> 167 ! <br /> 4 <br />