My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/22/2015 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2015
>
09/22/2015 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:08:36 AM
Creation date
11/24/2015 11:08:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
09/22/2015
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Including or Not Including Dunes in Area of Illumination Restrictions <br /> When the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to draft revisions to the sea turtle protection <br /> lighting regulations, that direction included a recommendation that the area of restricted illumination be <br /> extended beyond the beach and include the area of dunes as well. On that issue, staff's position is that <br /> including dunes in the area of illumination restrictions would: <br /> • Be inconsistent with the state model ordinance.and with other local ordinances statewide, which <br /> consistently refer to the beach (only) and not to the dune as the area of restricted illumination. <br /> (Inclusion of the dune area does not appear to be necessary to provide adequate protection, based <br /> on the model ordinance); <br /> • Effectively eliminate the allowance of any lighting within or immediately adjacent to dune areas, <br /> such as dune crossover lighting or yard edge lighting, including low profile shielded luminaries <br /> in or adjacent to dune areas; and <br /> • Be problematic from an enforcement access standpoint, in that the beach area is generally <br /> accepted as a public/accessible space and is the area of regular monitoring, whereas private dune <br /> areas are not. <br /> For those reasons, staff does not support inclusion of the dune in the area of restricted illumination. <br /> Moreover, the PZC voted at its hearing on June 11, 2015 to recommend the Board not include the dune <br /> area. Consequently, the proposed ordinance does not include dunes in the area of restricted illumination. <br /> Other Proposed Revisions <br /> In drafting the ordinance amendment, staff has taken the opportunity to clarify certain sections of the <br /> code and to revise certain aspects beyond the definition of illuminate and how it is applied and measured. <br /> Those other revisions include: <br /> • Clarification that tinted or filmed glass visible transmittance is measured from center-of-glass, <br /> consistent with the building code; and <br /> • Revisions to the "purpose" section to reference potential impacts of artificial lighting on adult <br /> sea turtles as well as hatchlings, consistent with scientific findings, and to reference the County's <br /> Sea Turtle Habitat Conservation Plan; and <br /> • Revisions to beachfront lighting approval procedures to require building contractors to certify <br /> compliance with beachfront lighting standards, subject to inspection verification by county staff, <br /> consistent with building inspection procedures. <br /> Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Policies <br /> County Comprehensive Plan Conservation Element Policy 7.8 provides that the County will apply sea <br /> turtle protection lighting criteria for beachfront development in'the unincorporated county. The proposed <br /> LDR amendment is consistent with Conservation Element Policy 7.8 and does not conflict with the <br /> public interest or any other LDRs. I <br /> 5 ' <br /> 227 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.