Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 5 , ." c 281 <br />Commissioner Wodtke explained that today we are here mainly <br />to address a letter dated October 31, 1984 from the Dept of the <br />Army which asks for a response from the local sponsor, the <br />County; that response to be in the form of a letter that must be <br />received no later than December, 1984. Currently, the City and <br />the County have endorsed the project and agreed to a 60/40 split <br />with the County funding 60% and the City 40%. However, neither <br />the City nor the County made a determination as to how those <br />dollars would be raised or how much of the 60/40 split would be <br />the responsibility of private property owners. As a result of <br />the decision to conduct a straw ballot after the results are in <br />from the study being conducted by the Army Corps of Engineers, <br />the Department of the Army has informed us that a commitment <br />from the City and County to actually do the project has to be <br />received before they can spend more than $50,000 of the $171,000 <br />grant monies budgeted for the study. <br />George Gross, member of the Beach Preservation and <br />Restoration Committee, pointed out the different funding plans <br />on a chart while Commissioner Wodtke explained the differences. <br />59 <br />