My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/2/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
1/2/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:11 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:03:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/02/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
for their animals. She did not see why her son, who is so <br />disabled, should have to go through all these complicated <br />procedures just to accomplish this. <br />Attorney Brandenburg explained that the owner currently is <br />subject to a fine for violating the leash law, but this must go <br />through the State Attorney's office, and he has a long list of <br />misdemeanors to deal with. The only way to impose the fine is <br />through court. There is a process whereby the County Attorney's <br />office could initiate the procedure upon the approval of the <br />State's Attorney, but we would have to specifically request that <br />authority. <br />Attorney Paull reported that he has been in contact with the <br />State's Attorney about initiating a case. He agreed that if <br />people are made more aware of the leash law and possible fines, <br />it would be helpful in enforcing the law. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Bird, seconded by <br />Commissioner Scurlock, that Attorney Paull be authorized to meet <br />with the State's Attorney in order to try to accomplish the steps <br />discussed. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wished to be sure we have some vehicle <br />for deciding what cases we should move ahead on as he did not <br />want to pursue innumerable incidents of a minor nature. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if a dog attack occurs in the City <br />of Vero Beach whether it is the Animal Control officer's respon- <br />sibility to investigate and get witnesses. <br />Attorney Paull stated that the ordinance contains standards <br />which it was felt would be best applicable on a countywide basis; <br />this would include any municipality which did not have an <br />ordinance inconsistent with ours. The City repealed their Animal <br />Control law and now the County does enforce this ordinance in the <br />City of Vero Beach. <br />Attorney Brandenburg pointed out that just because the <br />county has an ordinance countywide, our staff does not <br />73 <br />JA <br />2 19.95 BOOK 5 9F:s. -�`10 611 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.