My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/16/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
1/16/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:11 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:05:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/16/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
m <br />,)DISCUSSION RE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM <br />V A <br />Attorney Brandenburg referred to Chapter 84-110, Florida <br />Statutes, and explained that the Legislature has adopted a new <br />enforcement mechanism for alimony and child support payments; has <br />required the Clerk's office to set up the procedures to enforce <br />it; and has required the County Commission to fund the legal and <br />secretarial help necessary to enforce it. The difference is that <br />all the new orders for alimony and child support will contain <br />language requiring the obligor to notify the Clerk's office of <br />his place of employment at all times, and then if he is late with <br />a payment, the Clerk must notify him, and then send an order to <br />his employer, whereupon the employer automatically will deduct <br />the due amount from his pay. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked what happens if the individual <br />isn't employed, and Attorney Brandenburg noted there are a lot of <br />problems involved with this since some of these people have a <br />different job every week. He explained that this is an alternate. <br />means to enforce child support and alimony payments, and all the <br />other alternatives still are available. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if this provides an additional fee <br />structure, and Attorney Brandenburg stated that 3% of the <br />obligation is required as a fee to the Clerk's Office, and if <br />there is a delinquency, there are additional fees. This applies <br />from this point forward and to any past orders that are brought <br />in to be modified. It is an additional workload for the Clerk's <br />Office, and the Clerk has asked his office to help them set up <br />procedures. He noted, however, that he does not want his office <br />to get involved in the day to day child support enforcement <br />procedures; who will do that and how much it is going to take <br />will have to be addressed probably through the Clerk's office and <br />the Clerk's budget. <br />Commissioner Bird inquired if the Clerk has any idea of the <br />possible financial impact of these new procedures. <br />39 <br />SAN 16 1985 EOOK 5R <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.