1/30/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Attorney Vocelle felt the gate had been done away with, and Mr. Lyon noted the plan was drawn to show a 10' wide opening with a post in the center. Attorney Brandenburg insisted that there must be a security gate and asked why Mr. Lyon wished the opening to be 10' wide; Mr. Lyon explained that it was in order to allow for two way golf cart traffic. Commissioner Bird did not believe you can fit a golf cart through a 3' opening and felt a 10' opening with a post in the center would be fine as long as it had a locked gate. It was noted there will be a 24-hour restaurant, and the homeowners are worried about trespassers coming through the gate. Mr. Luckett, representative of Vista Home Owners Associa- tion, asked if the gate couldn't be just as wide enough for only one golf cart to fit through as he could not imagine there would ever be that much congestion. Attorney Brandenburg felt the important issue is that it be locked at night to meet the security requirements. Chairman Lyons asked if this matter is really ready for agreement today as he did not want to sit here and negotiate. Commissioner Scurlock believed that Mr. Luckett had agreed to seven items, and he was just interested in hearing them and seeing if we want to settle based on those conditions or whether we want to move ahead with the lawsuit. Attorney Brandenburg listed out the following conditions: 1) The masonry wall to be built as discussed above and plantings provided on the interior side of the wall that will mature and grow above the wall. 2) The dumpster on the southeast corner of the site will be relocated. 3) The air conditioning is to be designed with baffling to prevent noise being directed towards the condos. 4) The center's lighting is to be of the low mushroom type, not up on poles, except at the entrance of the center and directed away from the condominiums. 5) The signage on the back of the retail buildings is not to be lit signage. 7 BOOK FACE 1