1/30/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M never seen the revised site plan or reviewed it. He asked, if this is approved today, whether the site plan itself will be approved or just approved in concept; in other words, will it go back to the Planning & Zoning Commission again? Attorney Brandenburg stated that if the Board approves the settlement today, it is approved as shown on this site plan, and the site plan will not go back to the Planning & Zoning Commis- sion or the Planning Department again. Other than what is laid out in the record today, the site plan does not differ from that previously reviewed, and his recommendation is that we settle the lawsuit based on the listed improvements being made. Attorney Vocelle confirmed that if the Board accepts this recommendation, he would then cancel the hearing set for Thursday and move ahead to get a voluntary dismissal, and Attorney Brandenburg explained that he would do a stipulation laying out all the conditions precisely and attach a copy of this to the site plan to submit to the court for approval and dismissal of the lawsuit. Commissioner Wodtke asked if we can control that there never will be any more than one 24 hour restaurant on this site in the event this property is ever sold. Attorney Brandenburg stated that restriction would go with the site plan itself, and he will add some language that in the event any of the conditions laid out in the agreement are not fulfilled, the county will be able to enforce them through the Code Enforcement Board. - Commissioner Scurlock believed that Mr. Luckett has done an outstanding job and spent a lot of time working on this, and he appreciated Mr. Luckett's cooperation to help get this settled. Commissioner Bird noted that Planning approved the site plan originally and he would assume the modifications discussed would not throw it into any situation that would not be approvable. Director Keating stated that one of the staff attended the 01 BOOK