2/6/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

specific period of time. He felt we should require that the building be painted also. Direction Keating felt that would be acceptable. Commissioner Wodtke noted that if he should need additional money above the $3500 and this doesn't proceed, we should make sure there is enough money left for demolition. The Administrator agreed. Commissioners Scurlock and Bird agreed to include the County Attorney's suggested procedure as part of their Motion. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION including the addition. It was voted on and carried unanimously r /DISCUSSION RE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SELECTION OF BOND COUNSEL Attorney Brandenburg noted that his office has had some pressure recently to go to another bond counsel than the ones we have, and he would like to bring up a general discussion on this regard and have it on the record today so his office can have a clear policy and individuals applying to the County for Industrial Revenue Bonds know exactly where they stand. He noted that when we do these type bonds, he has to sign off on this also and give a local opinion of counsel. Therefore, it is important to him that the people he works with are people he knows are conservative and that he can trust and be sure they are working - for the County. Attorney Brandenburg noted that we have had our current bond counsel for a long time, and he has felt very comfortable working with them. He, therefore, would recommend that we stay with them until their prices become unreasonable or until we find they are not doing a competent job for us. He - further noted that those applying for these industrial revenue bonds receive a benefit because of the County's action, and it is very important to have a reliable bond counsel and be sure that the County is protected on these bonds. The County Attorney felt 34 FEB 6 1995 BOOK b 9 FAuE FI J � J