My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/6/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
2/6/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2017 3:58:31 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:08:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/06/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEB1985 BOOK 59 Frt,F 8921 <br />point. He emphasized that no developer nor anyone else has come <br />to the County with any other traffic analysis showing this not to <br />be the case, and therefore, there is a real question whether the <br />developments as proposed really meet the requirements of the <br />Comprehensive Land Use Plan. <br />Chairman Lyons noted that even though they might meet the <br />density aspect, that doesn't necessarily mean that they meet the <br />traffic aspect, and Attorney Brandenburg confirmed that it is <br />necessary to meet all the requirements -of the Plan, not just one, <br />in order for a development to proceed. <br />Attorney Caldwell asked if that means that nothing on the <br />south beach could be permitted any more, and Attorney Brandenburg <br />felt that it means that if you don't meet the requirements of the <br />traffic analysis and the Comp Plan, you won't be permitted. <br />Attorney Caldwell did not feel that they do down on the south <br />beach. <br />Commissioner Scurlock thought it would be April or May <br />before the traffic analysis is to a point where it could be <br />brought to the Transportation Planning Committee, and then an <br />impact fee ordinance might be adopted by September or October. <br />He was not for allowing a higher density on the ocean side when <br />everyone is advising against it. <br />Chairman Lyons agreed that we cannot make a change until we <br />know all the facts and we don't have them right now. <br />Commissioner Bird asked Attorney Brandenburg if we had the <br />ability at this point to change the moratorium of 3- units per <br />acre to effect site plans submitted as of a certain time or go <br />ahead and process them. <br />Attorney Brandenburg stated that the County could indicate <br />that they would process everything that was accepted prior to the <br />date of the adoption of the resolution, or could decide to drop <br />the resolution entirely and process everything that was submitted <br />prior to the date the ordinance is adopted, whenever that occurs. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if the Comp Plan allows anything <br />above traffic levels of C & D. <br />52 <br />M s M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.