My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/18/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
2/18/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:11 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:10:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/18/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- B00K 59, 893 <br />The twelve -channel capacity limitation does not permit <br />delivery of the choice of services common in the cable <br />communications industry today. Technical limitations <br />imposed by the equipment in place and current amplifier <br />spacing preclude expansion of the channel capacity of the <br />existing system (page 29, Exhibit 1). <br />The decision to rebuild the distribution plant at this time <br />was properly taken according to our consultant. There are <br />areas, particularly along the beach, where supporting strand <br />wire corrosion has reached the point that replacement is <br />mandatory (page 29, bottom of page 58, top of page 59, <br />Exhibit 1) . <br />The consultant states the system as proposed cannot be <br />termed old-fashioned or obsolete but certainly "no frills". <br />In comparison to other systems nationwide and in Florida <br />after the rebuild, the basic system facility will be as <br />technologically advanced as most operations its size. <br />However no local origination, institutional or emergency <br />alert facilities are proposed; nor are any ancillary <br />services beyond the classic entertainment concept of cable <br />television planned. The important question is whether or <br />not the system will meet the specific, well defined needs of <br />Indian River County. What is disturbing to our consultant <br />is that there has been no apparent effort to define those <br />needs (page 67, Exhibit 1). <br />Current subscriber services, as our consultant commented, <br />offer a relatively restricted menu, which of course, will be <br />expanded when the new system is operational. "Must Carry" <br />rules are covered thoroughly by our consultant. These rules <br />account for the duplication of some networks (pages 77-79, <br />Exhibit 1) . <br />Proposed program services (subject to change) are listed in <br />Table 4, page 80 of Exhibit 1. Channels 14/A through 22/I <br />will be viewed on channel 2 of the subscribers' television <br />receiver by means of a set-top converter. So-called cable <br />ready television sets will not require the converter. <br />EXHIBIT 2: RATE PACKET - SUMMARY <br />The rate request packet submitted by Florida Cablevision is <br />attached as Exhibit 2. They are proposing to increase the <br />present rates of $7.25 for 12 channels to $9.00 for 20 <br />channels (page 13, section I, Exhibit 2). <br />In order for the consumer to be able to pick up channels <br />14/A - 22/I, each television set will require its own <br />separate converter. Subscribers may obtain converters in <br />three basic ways: <br />1) own a cable ready TV set <br />2) purchase their own converter <br />3) rent a converter <br />Florida Cablevision anticipates it will rent converters to a <br />number of subscribers at a cost of approximately $2.00 per <br />month for a basic converter and $4.00 per month for a deluxe <br />remote control converter (page 12, section II, Exhibit 2). <br />The basic converter does not have remote control capacities. <br />The deluxe converter does. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.