Laserfiche WebLink
MAR 6 1995 BOOK 60 F,,cF 59 <br />Director Davis stressed that in the past these expenses have <br />come out of the Road & Bridge budget and he feels it would be <br />appropriate for Road & Bridge to be reimbursed if the election is <br />not a county election. The $10.00 charge made by the Supervisor <br />of Elections in the past in no way recoups the costs involved. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that basically this establishes <br />a specific policy and lets the entities decide whether they want <br />• us to provide this service for them. <br />Commissioner Bird stated that he agrees with the philosophy, <br />but he questioned the rates on the use of the vehicles, for <br />instance, $24.00 an hour for the use of a pickup truck. He did <br />not want to overcharge anyone. <br />Director Davis informed the Board that the rates are from <br />the State G.S.A., plus this includes fuel for the vehicles, <br />insurance, maintenance, etc. He further noted that some of the <br />vehicles used, such as the closed van and the lift gate trucks, <br />we had to purchase specifically for the purpose of transporting <br />the voting machines, and we are trying to recoup the cost of <br />having to buy that specialized equipment. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0) <br />adopted the fee structure for moving voting <br />machines as requested by the Superintendent of <br />Road & Bridge and authorized the Supervisor of <br />Elections to charge accordingly. <br />43RD AVENUE COMMERCIAL STUDY <br />The hour of 9:15 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy <br />Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication <br />attached, to -wit: <br />18 <br />