My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/20/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
3/20/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:12 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:15:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/20/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
definitely is worth having, and felt the County should be proud <br />of their Finance Department. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed Finance Director Fry and his <br />department, as well as May Zima, have done a very good job. His <br />only other comment was that he did want to look at our G&A <br />charges next year as he believed we may have been a little heavy <br />on some departments in this area. He noted that it is most <br />important to know where costs are generated and have them <br />properly charged back. <br />Chairman Lyons expressed his pleasure with the financial <br />report and having such a clean audit. He complimented Director <br />Fry and his organization for putting us in this position. <br />DISCUSSION RE PURCHASE OF SOUTHERN BELL BUILDING <br />Administrator Wright informed the Board that he had talked <br />with one of the owners of the Southern Bell building, and it <br />appears they are not amenable to a lower offer. He, therefore, <br />would suggest we proceed with the selection of architects and <br />build the Sheriff a building. <br />Commissioner Bird reported that he had talked to the other <br />owner, and he does not agree this sale is necessarily dead. The <br />owner feels the reputation of the building has been damaged, and <br />he would like the opportunity to come back with some further <br />testimony to refute the.engineering report we got on the roof. <br />Administrator Wright agreed that is certainly the Board's <br />prerogative, and he felt the roof undoubtedly can be brought to <br />Code. To meet Code, however, the roof only has to withstand 110 <br />mph winds, and if we are going to put the 911 system in a <br />structure, he believed we are going to need something that <br />exceeds Code. The Administrator felt that the Bell Building is <br />fine for normal office space, and if we were going to move the <br />Planning Department, for instance, that would be different, but <br />with the valuable technical equipment involved with the Sheriff's <br />Department, we need something more substantial. <br />83 <br />BOOK 6 0 FADE ?59 <br />MAR 2 0 1985 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.