Laserfiche WebLink
and tells them to stop. He agreed with Commissioner Wodtke that <br />further clarification is needed on these proposals. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wodtke, to table this item until next <br />Wednesday's meeting in order to obtain further <br />clarification on these proposals. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion <br />failed by a vote of 2-3, Commissioners Bowman, <br />Scurlock and Lyons dissenting. <br />Discussion continued on the cost of spraying 40 acres <br />instead of the entire 80 acres for the period extending to <br />December, which Administrator Wright felt would be the case. <br />The importance of a post -bloom spray was discussed at length. <br />Utility Services Director Terry Pinto explained that if the <br />Department of Environmental Regulations requires the percolation <br />for the entire plant to be built at once, then it will be <br />necessary to pull 40 or more acres out of fruit production; <br />however, staff is hoping that will not be the case. In any <br />event, the post -bloom spraying time will be passed before we <br />receive the final determination from the DER. <br />COMMISSIONERS SCURLOCK AND BOWMAN modified their <br />previous Motion to read: that the County go with a <br />unit price basis which will give staff the flexibility <br />to either delete acreage or increase/decrease the <br />spraying application. <br />Commissioner Bird recommended that the firm also handle the <br />irrigation of the groves. <br />Chairman Lyons asked Commissioner Wodtke if he felt it was <br />necessary to have a contract beforehand to sell the fruit, and <br />21 <br />MAR 27 1985goaK. Fk1Alul <br />