My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/27/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
3/27/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:12 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:16:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/27/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
there was a very strong feeling that the Comp Plan we adopted was <br />very much in kind with what the public expected up there. <br />Chairman Lyons opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. <br />Michael O'Haire, Attorney representing both the Edmonds and <br />the Stokes (the applicant in the next public hearing scheduled <br />for today), expressed his surprise when he visited the area <br />recently and saw how so much had changed since the public <br />hearings were held on the Comp Plan. He passed out an aerial <br />view of the area and surrounding areas and pointed out that the <br />River's Edge subdivision was completely built out. Attorney <br />O'Haire stressed that after having owned the property for years, <br />his clients simply want the same rights as their neighbors, and <br />he believed the County has adequate safeguards for whatever <br />environmental considerations may be involved along the Sebastian <br />River. <br />Commissioner Bird recalled that back when they reviewed this <br />area under the Comp Plan, he was of the opinion that maybe all of <br />this area should be LD -1, but the residents of Roseland area came <br />en masse and unanimously requested RR -2, a special rural <br />category. <br />Attorney O'Haire pointed out that what has actually <br />developed up there is not as he understood it would be under the <br />Land Use Plan. <br />Director Keating explained that if this acreage was <br />subdivided at 3 units per acre, the Dept. of Environmental Health <br />would require the lots to be approximately 100 x 200, as there is <br />no water or wastewater available. Under the LD -1, as a practical <br />matter, there would be less than two units per acre. <br />Commissioner Bowman understood that the water situation at <br />River's Edge is deplorable and assumed that these people would be <br />drawing from the same aquifer, but Attorney O'Haire believed the <br />water problems at River's Edge related to their treatment plant <br />and not the aquifer. <br />W? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.