3/28/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NEAR 2 8 1985 BOOK � � 0 1 FuE383 383 to Section 2 there is only one such piece of property in the RR -1 Land Use designation, and Planner Shearer reported that there were two. Attorney Brandenburg felt these should be done when staff does the commercial changeover, and the Board agreed. The County Attorney continued that the idea for the list of exceptions is to assure that properties that either had submitted site plans, approved site plans, or were built prior to adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, remain conforming. If there is no other basis for these exceptions, he recommended that this be laid out specifically in the preamble to Section 2 so that in future years it would be made plain just why these exceptions were adopted. Commissioner Wodtke noted that on the top of the third page of the proposed Resolution, there are headings, i.e., Old Zoning Districts - Land Use Designations - New Zoning Districts, and he asked if those same headings shouldn't be set out under Section 1 on Page 2. Director Keating confirmed they should and that they will be included in the ordinance. Commissioner Wodtke continued to question the Conversion Table, noting that it says everything designated Agricultural will now be A-1. He brought up R-1PM, which is Permanent Mobile Home Park zoning, and stated that he did not have any problem with one specific piece of property, but it appears we are talking about all R-1PM being in A-1. Planner Shearer clarified that this would only relate to the R-1PM that is designated Agricultural, and he believed there is a good chance that there is only one property zoned R-1PM and designated Agricultural on the Land Use Map. This would involve property that was zoned for R-1PM, but never developed. Commissioner Wodtke inquired about the density in RFD, and Director Keating stated that the Rural Fringe Development District is one unit per 21 acres. 10 W l