My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/28/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
3/28/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:12 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:16:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/28/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAR 2 8 1985 � Boa GO Fn 57 <br />logically would go to RM -6. However, since it was a lawful use <br />when the Plan was adopted, and, therefore, considered in <br />conformance with the Plan, staff would recommend it be rezoned <br />to RM -8. In addition, we have a number of mobile home <br />developments, which were approved and conforming, have correct <br />zoning designations, and are in areas designated as LD -2, but <br />the Plan when adopted stated these would be allowed only in MD -1 <br />and MXD Land Use designations. This would not permit any future <br />mobile home development, and for this reason, staff proposes to <br />convert them to the appropriate mobile home zoning district. <br />Commissioner Wodtke wished to know if someone has R-1 now <br />at 6 units per acre, but they are in LD -1, whether the R-1 will <br />become RS -3 or RS -6, and Planner Shearer stated RS -3. <br />Commissioner Wodtke noted that, in essence, by this action <br />we are reducing the densities allowed, and Planner Shearer <br />agreed this conversion table will reduce the densities allowed <br />in the county substantially. <br />Chairman Lyons pointed out that this makes them in <br />conformance with the Land Use Plan, and Planner Shearer felt <br />that, in effect, the Land Use Plan lowered a lot of densities <br />when it was adopted in 1982. <br />Attorney Brandenburg clarified that the zoning action <br />contemplated does not reduce densities. The Comprehensive Plan <br />already has done that because an individual who had zoning that <br />exceeded the Comprehensive Plan couldn't build at that density <br />anyway. All this does is aid him in the future development of <br />that property by not requiring him to go through the rezoning <br />process which would have been necessary before he could develop <br />his property. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed that the Commission took <br />extraordinary measures when developing and adopting the <br />Comprehensive Plan, having meetings in the High School <br />auditorium, etc., to identify that densities were to be reduced <br />in the county. <br />4 <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.