3/28/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NAR 2 8 1985 _BOOK 60 L",u 359 Commissioner Wodtke just wished to be sure that the people out there know what is happening. He expressed surprise that we only have six or seven people in the audience since basically we are doing an administrative rezoning of all the residential land in the county. Commissioner Scurlock stated that his only question was about the exceptions and that has been answered. Attorney Brandenburg wished to add some wording to Sec. 6, Severability, so that in the event that a new district were found for any reason to be inapplicable to a piece of property, the old district assigned to it still would be applicable. He recommended the following language be added at the end of that paragraph: " with the exception that should the application of the new districts to any property be held unconstitutional, inoperative or void, then such property shall be considered zoned under the old district applicable to the property as of the date of adoption of this ordinance." The Chairman asked if there were any questions about making these zoning districts conform to the densities in the Land Use Plan or any questions about any exceptions. Planner Shearer reported that staff has had a situation arise where they have discovered some properties along the Sebastian River with less than one acre units, which are presently zoned R-1, but have a Land Use designation of RR -2, which allows only one unit per acre. Staff would like them assigned to an RS -3 district rather than RS -1. They would be listed under the table of exceptions and are described as follows: 1) Lot 31, Sec. 22, Fleming Grant. 2) Lots 1-7, Sunnyfield Subdivision. Commissioner Scurlock noted that obviously we are not perfect and asked what the process would be to deal with inconsistencies that may have been overlooked. Director Keating stated that his department would have no 6 W