My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/3/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
4/3/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:12 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:16:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/03/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Future Land Use Pattern <br />The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property, and the <br />land north, east, and southeast of it, as MD -2, Medium -Density <br />Residential 2 (up to 10 units/acre). The land west and <br />southwest of the subject property is designated as part of the <br />U.S.1 Commercial Corridor which extends 600 feet east of U.S.1 <br />between the City of Vero Beach on the north and 4th Street on <br />the south. The Commercial Corridor was established to reflect <br />the C-1 zoning district boundary and the existing commercial <br />development when the Land Use Plan was adopted. <br />There are two general alternatives for the future development <br />of the subject property. One alternative is to amend the land <br />use plan and rezone the property to allow commercial <br />development of the entire 5.91 acre parcel. The other <br />alternative is to leave the subject property (1.95 acres) as <br />MD -2 and zoned multiple -family to be developed in residential <br />uses and allow the remaining part of the parcel (3.96 acres) to <br />develop commercially. <br />Alternative 1 <br />Under the first alternative, the subject property would be <br />redesignated as commercial on the land use plan and rezoned <br />commercial. Redesignating the subject property as commercial <br />would deviate from the 600 foot depth of the commercial <br />corridor. This deviation would encourage other property owners <br />east of the commercial corridor to apply for a commercial land <br />use designation and would encourage strip commercial develop- <br />ment along 6th Avenue which is currently a residential street. <br />This alternative will also allow for development of a use which <br />is incompatible with the existing single-family use to the <br />north, and it will create additional traffic on 6th Avenue, a <br />secondary collector roadway which already carries a heavy <br />volume of traffic. <br />Alternative 2 <br />The second alternative is to leave the property designated <br />residential and zoned for multi -family development. Based on <br />the size of the property (1.95 acres), the current land use <br />designation and zoning would allow 19 multiple -family units. <br />The development of 19 multiple -family units on the subject <br />property would be a reasonable use of the property based on the <br />existing single-family and duplex development north and east of <br />the subject property and the potential commercial• development <br />of the land to the west. <br />Transportation System: <br />The subject property has direct access to 6th Avenue and 8th <br />Street (both classified as secondary collector streets on the <br />Thoroughfare Plan). The maximum development of the subject <br />property under the proposed C-1 zoning could attract up to <br />1,862 average annual daily trips (AADT). When combined with <br />the commercial property to the west, the entire site could <br />attract 5,626 AADT. Under the current zoning, development of <br />the subject property would generate 133 AADT and development of <br />the parcel to the west would attract 3,764 AADT. <br />Environment <br />The subject property is not designated as environmentally <br />sensitive nor is it in a flood -prone area. <br />37 BOCK <br />APS 33 1985 40 -2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.