My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/3/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
4/3/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:12 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:16:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/03/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR 3 1985 Bou 60 9� <br />hook in, but even if they were to want to, they would not be in a <br />position to agree to the so-called current fees. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if he understood correctly that tie <br />County Attorney is going to start negotiations with the premise <br />that they are required to hook up and are required to pay the <br />current impact fee, and if so, on what he would base the justifi- <br />cation for this. <br />Attorney Brandenburg noted that we currently have a county- <br />wide impact fee ordinance that applies to everybody, and we have <br />just assessed individuals along SR 60 $1,250 for each ERU of <br />wastewater and about $1,000 for each ERU of water. Under their <br />franchise, it would be Florida Atlantic's contention that they <br />would only have to pay $70 per ERU for water, which would be <br />grossly unfair to everyone else who has now paid for the water <br />line run out there. <br />Commissioner Bird felt in the one case, however, you have <br />facilities already in the ground versus having to build new <br />facilities at today's cost. <br />Attorney Brandenburg pointed out that when they hook in, <br />they will be using facilities that have been built at today's <br />costs. <br />Commissioner Bird wished further clarification re situations <br />where the transmission lines presently are in the ground - in <br />other words, are the new projects going in on Route 60 <br />responsible for putting in their lines at their cost and then, in <br />addition, responsible for paying the fee for their impact on the <br />main system? <br />Attorney Brandenburg confirmed they would already have their <br />internal lines in place and they would be required to pay the <br />impact fee just like everyone else for connection to the plant <br />capacity and the main transmission lines. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that we are not looking to hook <br />any of them up at the present time; we do not have the capacity. <br />This would just put us in a position to provide quality water and <br />62 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.