Laserfiche WebLink
APR 10 1985 <br />BOOK 60 FAGE.506 <br />establishing a precedent with this case, but pointed out <br />that the Code Enforcement Board has the authority to impose <br />a fine or penalty. He felt the primary discrepancy was that <br />108th Avenue was not paved and explained that the developer <br />of KOA plans to access 108th Avenue and has agreed to pay <br />for the paving; however, this apparently was not understood <br />by everyone involved. Attorney O'Haire stated that his <br />client mistakenly thought the lawyers were handling this and <br />it was not their intent to evade County permitting <br />requirements. <br />Commissioner Scurlock suggested that we consider a cash <br />bond alternative. <br />Attorney O'Haire believed the County has the ability to <br />bond these improvements, but Commissioner Scurlock did not <br />want the County to get into the business of bonding major <br />improvements and then having to do them. <br />Attorney O'Haire submitted that the work would be done <br />within 10 days and believed the paving was in process right <br />now. <br />Darrell McQueen of Lloyd and Associates felt there are <br />issues that have to be addressed such as landscaping and <br />parking spaces on the site. He was concerned that there is <br />no latitude for correcting minor things on a site plan with <br />respect to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. He pointed <br />out that the hedge was hit by the freeze and 50% of that was <br />replaced almost immediately. Mr. McQueen felt the Board was <br />going to have to find some way to modify the exact <br />requirements for landscaping shown on a site plan. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed we could allow certain <br />minor items to be bonded of, but there has to be a limit. <br />Mr. McQueen suggested those minor items be defined for <br />use by staff. <br />Director Keating advised that Mr. McQueen's input would <br />75 <br />