My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/11/1985 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
4/11/1985 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:12 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:18:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/11/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR 11 1985 soonI Al)E 5D4 <br />grandfathered in, they have been considered non -conforming for <br />years. <br />Commissioner Scurlock stressed that tonight's action will <br />not affect any commercial zoning; all non-residential zoning will <br />be addressed in other public hearings in the near future. <br />Mr. Broocke asked if the owners of these properties would <br />have to come in and individually request rezoning in order to <br />conform to the Land Use Plan. <br />Mr. Shearer advised that the County is going to look at the <br />entire U.S. #1 corridor as staff has received many inquiries from <br />residents in Wabasso. <br />Commissioner Bird felt the Board realizes that the U.S. #1 <br />corridor would be the toughest area to rezone and that some <br />people are bound to be unhappy, but we are going to do the best <br />job we can. <br />Commissioner Wodtke advised Mr. Broocke to meet with his <br />neighbors on this matter and get their input back to staff as he <br />felt that perhaps many of their concerns could be addressed <br />before the public hearings for the non-residential districts <br />begin. <br />Frank DeJoia of Roseland asked about the area in Roseland <br />between the Sebastian River and Roseland Road which has a <br />designation of RR -2 allowing a maximum of I unit per acre. <br />Staff had advised him that two or three areas within this zone <br />were divided sometime ago into smaller parcels and staff was <br />considering rezoning these to RS -3 instead of RS -1. He wondered <br />how that could be done without changing the land use because he <br />didn't feel the RS -3 is compatible with the RR -2. <br />Mr. Shearer explained that this was something that came up <br />when the Board considered two Comp Plan amendments a few weeks <br />ago, the two being the Edmonds' & Snokes' requests. Because of <br />that analysis staff found that Sunnyfield Subdivision and another <br />in Lot 31 of Section 22 of Fleming Grant both had a number of <br />parcels which were less than an acre in size and zoned R-2, which <br />8 <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.