My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/17/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
4/17/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:12 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:19:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/17/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR 17 1985 Bou 60 z:-,�, 573 <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />The Vice Chairman asked if there were any corrections or <br />additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 20, <br />1985. There were none. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0) <br />approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of <br />March 20, 1985. <br />The Vice Chairman asked if there were any corrections or <br />additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 27, <br />1985. <br />Commissioner Bird noted that on Page 28 he was quoted as <br />stating that "if the site plan was approved....., it should be <br />cast in stone.......", but he believed he had stated that "it <br />should not necessarily be cast in stone." He requested that the <br />Recording Secretary check this on the tape. <br />Commissioner Wodtke referred to the paragraph on the very <br />last page beginning "The several bills and accounts against the <br />County having been audited were examined and found to be correct <br />were approved and warrants issued......" He felt this should be <br />an agenda item. <br />The Recording Secretary noted that this is a standard <br />statement which has been included at the end of the Minutes for <br />many years, and Administrative Aide Liz Forlani explained that at <br />one time the Commissioners did go through every bill, but we have <br />instituted more sophisticated procedures now. <br />Attorney Brandenburg fe-It this statement is not necessary <br />and'that it can be eliminated from the Minutes. <br />Commissioner Wodtke stated that he would have no problem <br />with including it as a Consent Agenda item, but Vice Chairman <br />Scurlock believed it is an outdated process and should be <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.