Laserfiche WebLink
done and instruct staff to review this in six months <br />to see that work is continuing at a significant pace. <br />Commissioner Wodtke stated that he does feel it is <br />questionable whether enough work has been done, and he would <br />encourage them to move ahead on it. This should either be <br />developed or not, but he would like to give them another six <br />months. <br />Commissioner Bowman noted that if this is developed, it will <br />not be consistent with the current ordinances and wished to know <br />if we have any remedy. <br />Attorney Brandenburg stated that the only remedy is to <br />determine the site plan is not active and require a new one be <br />filed. <br />Chairman Lyons agreed this situation is really marginal and <br />stated that if it weren't for the kind of operation it is, he <br />would vote against the Motion. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously (4-0) <br />DISCUSSION PROPOSED REVISION OF AQUATIC PRESERVES RULE <br />Art Challacombe, Chief of Environmental Planning reviewed <br />his memo, as follows: <br />69 <br />BOOK 60 PAGE 7,8 <br />