Laserfiche WebLink
MAY 8 1985 BOOK 60 FAGr8-1 <br />2. Alternatives and Analysis <br />The low bid was submitted by B & B Building Systems Ft. Pierce, F1, <br />in the amount of $19,842.00. The bid meets all specifications. <br />3. Recommendation and Funding <br />It is recommended that IRC #240 be awarded to the low bidder, B & B <br />Building Systems in the amount of $19,842.00. <br />There is $32,000.00 budgeted for the building extension. <br />Commissioner Wodtke believed that more local contractors <br />should be included on our bid mailing list, and Assistant County <br />Administrator Dean explained that only 7 bid specifications were <br />sent out because those companies were the only ones with <br />experience in building metal buildings. He noted that the bid <br />was advertised in the paper also. <br />Commissioner Bird questioned the spread in the prices <br />submitted by the two firms that did respond, and asked if there <br />was any confusion about the specifications. <br />Assistant Administrator Dean stated that they went over the <br />specifications again with the low bidder and he indicated he was <br />comfortable with his bid. <br />Discussion took place on the construction of metal buildings <br />and Public Works Director Jim Davis explained that the <br />specifications drawn up by the Engineering Department called for <br />a pre-engineered building and required wind -load, roof span and <br />loading analyses to be submitted to the County. These analyses <br />have to be approved by the County and the Building Department <br />before a building permit can be obtained. <br />Commissioner Wodtke believed the specifications gave a lot <br />of leeway. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously tabled <br />this matter to allow Purchasing Manager Goodrich to <br />provide further information on this bid, possibly -at <br />next week's meeting. <br />6 <br />r <br />