6/12/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r- -7 JUN 12 1985 800K< FnUE208 characteristics of the neighborhood should be considered when determining where to locate one. Commissioner Scurlock recalled that when some of the Commissioners visited another ACTS, INC. total care facility, they noticed that beauty salons, barber shops, etc. were contained with the the project, and asked if those uses are still available. Director Keating stated that those uses still would be allowable as a modification to their site plan. Commissioner Wodtke understood that internal shops would be open to the public, but Mr. Logie stated that internal shops are not intended for use by the general public, just by residents and their guests. William Caldwell, Attorney representing Dale Sorensen, William Becker and Charles Bradshaw, owners of a 20 -acre tract on the southwest corner of 74th Avenue, advised that his clients have filed a petition for a rezoning which is scheduled for the June 27th meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission. He asked Attorney Brandenburg if their petition would fall under the same provisions as that of the ACTS request. Attorney Brandenburg explained that the Board did not specifically say whether or not the ordinance would be applied to petitions that were pending as of the date the ordinance was adopted, and asked the Board to clarify their position on that. Commissioner Scurlock felt that we should be consistent since both applications were in prior to the adoption of the ordinance and because he did not see how we could do it for one and not the other. Attorney Caldwell asked if that were the case, would he be correct in saying that the neighborhood node concept for that particular intersection could be considered for up to 8 acres, assuming that the distance requirements for the Sorensen petition was satisfied. He noted that the ACTS people do not intend to develop the node, just the Indian River Estates project. 22