6/19/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUN 10 1985 BOOKS rlrCo� in the river - between the mouth of the lake and the existing channel and not impact the river bed whatsoever. In other words, they would create a canal to an existing channel; they could do this by shifting a building back a little; and they would have to redesign the site plan slightly. Mr. Muller again emphasized that he has a dredge and fill permit from the DER, and he would like the Commission to put some confidence in the authority of the state and federal governments and not get into this endless hash of all the other societies. He believed this would take the burden of the problem off everyone; he would have to address this with the DNR and get their approval and then he still has to come back to the county with the modified plan before he can do anything. Mr. Muller further pointed out that no adjoining property owner has objected to what they want to do, but rather he believed they feel it is beneficial to them. He would have to get an agreement with the Semblers, but did not expect that would be a problem. ' Chairman Lyons stated he would be happier with the alternative Mr. Muller suggested than with the dredging of the channel, but he did not know the effect on the water quality. Commissioner Bowman noted that Sembler has a dead end canal, and Mr. Muller pointed out that his alternative would open up the dead end canal. Chairman Lyons noted that he would like to bring this discussion to a close and asked what action the Board would suggest. Commissioner Bowman stated that she would like to put it to a vote. Chairman Lyons believed that Mr. Muller is a man of his word, and if Mr. Muller says he will abandon the channel and try to go this way, he would be inclined to believe him. Commissioner Wodtke realized we have a 14 day deadline, but asked if it would meet the concerns of our staff and Commissioner Bowman if Mr. Muller agreed that he will apply to DER with this 68