7/10/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

_I JUL 10 1985 BOOK 61 N,GE 45-S Attorney Brandenburg suggested that the Board approve the staff recommendation with the deletion of Paragraph #3. Commissioner Bowman explained to Mrs. Reed that the 4" has nothing to do with what we are discussing today; Lloyd E Associates' letter wipes it out; and the Board is recommending that an after -the -fact permit be issued. Commissioner Bowman noted, however, that in the event the Homeowners Association ever wants to dredge the canal, she did not know what will happen to the Reed's wall, but she believed that will be a civil matter. Mrs. Reed still wished to know the County's stand in regard to a footer encroaching on someone else's property - she believed a footer can encroach on an easement. The Administrator did not agree that anything can encroach, and Commissioner Bird felt possibly it could encroach into a setback area, but it can't cross property lines. Mrs. Reed continued to complain that everyone else in the neighborhood has built walls, 9 gotten inspections, etc., and gotten after -the -fact permits without any trouble; so, why can't she. Director Keating believed what Mrs. Reed was referring to was an entirely different situation decided by the Board of Adjustment in regard to the height of a wall, which had nothing to do with a retaining wall in an area that had jurisdiction by the DER. Vice Chairman Scurlock did not know of any after -the -fact permits that have come before this Commission, and Commissioner Wodtke pointed out that this matter is on the agenda speaking to a building code violation only. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0) accepted recommendations #1 and #2, staff memo dated July 2, 1985, and agreed to delete recom- mendation #3. 46