Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 41985 BOOK 61 NV)E 9�9 <br />Commissioner Bowman felt the Commission as guardians of the <br />taxpayer's dollars should be concerned about the way the Inlet <br />Commission is presently functioning; they have spent over <br />$700,000 unaccounted for dollars, which should be a primary <br />concern, and she did not know how we are going to solve it. <br />Chairman Lyons pointed out that the Inlet District is an <br />autonomous group similar to the Hospital Board or Mosquito <br />Control District, and Commissioner Scurlock agreed that the <br />Motion on the floor addresses all that we can address. <br />Commissioner Bowman suggested following up on Mr. Forte's <br />suggestion to appoint some Commissioners to work with Commis- <br />sioners from Brevard County on this, but Chairman Lyons felt we <br />first need more information. <br />Commissioner Bowman noted that there is a copy of the <br />audit of the Inlet District on file, but the Chairman did not <br />feel that is our business. Commissioner Bowman did not agree. <br />Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that the Inlet Commission <br />is controlled by state law, and if the audit provisions are not <br />being complied with, the States Attorney would file some action, <br />not the County Commission. He further noted that there are <br />recall provisions and a referendum procedure to deal with this. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK CALLED FOR THE QUESTION ON THE <br />MOTION AS AMENDED. It was voted on and carried <br />unanimously. <br />Administrator Wright requested that the Commission deviate <br />from the agenda slightly as he and Attorney Vitunac both are <br />under subpoena for depositions, and he is substituting for Public <br />Works Director Davis on the Vero Highlands item. <br />DISCUSSION VERO HIGHLANDS TRAFFIC CONDITIONS <br />The Board reviewed the following memo from the Public Works <br />Director: <br />56 <br />