My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/11/1985 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
9/11/1985 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:08:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/11/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rSEP <br />111985 <br />Boon '46dI9 <br />PAGE <br />That geographic area generated $18,000. They will be receiving <br />two fire engines, each costing $32,000. <br />Vice Chairman Scurlock emphasized that one of the reasons <br />the MSTU was set up is because we had individuals come in who <br />were unhappy with the drainage and the condition of the roads, <br />and we looked at the MSTU simply because the property there did <br />not generate enough taxes to pay for even the minimal services <br />that were being rendered right now. All this money everyone <br />seems to think we collect in taxes simply is not true. <br />Mr. Reynolds asked why the county would clear a street where <br />no one is living when the back ditch on 77th hasn't been touched <br />in many years. <br />Commissioner Bird did not feel we can go back and correct <br />all the sins of the past, but he did feel moving ahead with a <br />drainage plan and proper engineering is a step in the right <br />direction. <br />Mr. Reynolds contended this should have been done long ago. <br />He felt that the County either needs to train their people or get <br />someone who knows what they are doing and then went on to com- <br />plain at length that the county underpays their workers, which is <br />why he quit. <br />Mr. McBride proposed that the State Legislature should be <br />asked to abolish the $25,000 Homestead Exemption so that everyone <br />pays an equal share. <br />Administrator Wright informed him that this proposal was <br />brought up to the Legislature, heavily discussed, and defeated, <br />and it will be brought up again next year. The Vice Chairman <br />noted that the reason for the per parcel/acre assessment method <br />is because homestead doesn't apply in that case; everybody pays. <br />Ray Polazzi, 8350 93rd Ave., believed that Vero Lake Estates <br />was created in the early 150s and at that time the developers got <br />plans approved to lay out roads, dig ditches, swales, etc. He, <br />therefore, did not see why we need more engineering and <br />development for what is already there. He did realize we have <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.