My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/11/1985 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
9/11/1985 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:08:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/11/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK <br />things are not inflating at the same rate as they did in the past <br />and we cannot continue to pay people as we did in the past or <br />continue to spend money as we have in the past. He asked that <br />the Board try to look at this budget as if they were in a profit <br />and loss situation where there was only a certain amount of money <br />to spend. This county happens to be a fortunate county in that <br />it is in better shape than many others, but Mr. Willis felt we <br />need to take an overall look and adjust to what the real world is <br />now, and if we don't do it today, next year it will have to be <br />even more severe. <br />Commissioner Bowman felt Mr. Willis made a very poor <br />analogy. She pointed out that we are living in a county that is <br />a very high growth area and this is the cost of growth, not <br />inflation. Just one example is our Landfill. <br />Mr. Willis felt much of the growth the Commissioner believes <br />we are having is something that happened in the past. He did not <br />believe that the growth on the Barrier Island, with John's <br />Island, the Moorings, etc., will continue. <br />Commissioner Bowman did not agree. <br />Vice Chairman Scurlock felt that debate on that point could <br />continue indefinitely, but he did believe the proposed budget is <br />an extremely conservative budget and that the 3 million increase <br />is very easily accounted for in areas over which the county does <br />not have any control. We have had many activities that were <br />traditionally funded by the federal government cease to be <br />funded, but not necessarily the requirement to conduct those <br />activities, and we have to continue to conduct them at a local <br />level just as if they were still funded by the state. For one <br />example, the state gave many roads back to the counties to <br />maintain. Another area where we have very little control is our <br />liability insurance and its increasing premium. Our medical <br />insurance costs went up tremendously, and this year for the first <br />time, we set a cap and are having the employees participate in <br />paying the premium. The Vice Chairman did agree that growth has <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.