My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/25/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
9/25/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 11:09:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/25/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�','. �:-^ i.-�-rz'i� . <.i -_...-.-..tet'...._ .<�.s n-K,.pa�' _.�aY.:»c. ,+lop.�sY-.-.�. _=.. ..:. :� ..—:.�_ ._ _ -. ... _ rte- �... -...- .c. .. �. _ _ _ ..'y+�_.SF= g3ia rc. ,�issf'pc„'-"YrJ�.'"3 �•�v..+.-�PPM1, -. �. <br />SEP 25 1985 <br />BOOK FAGE <br />Mrs. Lawhon confirmed that Mrs. Condon, whose signature was <br />removed, is here this morning but because of health reasons has <br />requested that Mrs. Lawhon inform the Board for her that she does <br />want the street paved. <br />Mr. Lawhon believed what he was proposing was doing a lot of <br />good for the people in the area; actually 11th Lane is nothing <br />more than an alley; and this would solve the dust problem. He <br />felt that lots that go from street to street do have some <br />responsibility. <br />Ms. Terry noted that even with Mrs. Condon's signature the <br />petition only represents.about 360 of the property owners that <br />front that portion, but Director Davis noted that this does <br />represent about 650 of the frontage involved. Our policy is to <br />require 66.60, or 2/3 of the frontage. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed the Board could accept the <br />petition and declare it valid at any percent. <br />Corinne Bean, 3234 12th St. S.W., came before the Board <br />representing her neighbors and read a statement setting out the <br />following reasons for their opposition to the paving of 11th <br />Lane: they live on the ridge and have no drainage problem; they <br />are between two streets, 11th Lane being their alley; their <br />houses all face 12th St. S.W., (there are only 2 homes facing <br />11th Lane.) If there is only one paved road in Dixie Heights, it <br />will be a speedway, and if any road is to be paved, they would <br />prefer it to be 12th St. on which they front. She further stated <br />that none of them ever had a dust problem until Mr. Lawhon <br />brought his heavy equipment in. Mrs. Bean believed Mr. Lawhon's <br />only motivation is developing for his profit at their expense; <br />she questioned why he totally cleared the area fronting Old <br />Dixie; and further claimed that he had made false statements to <br />Mrs. Hammill, a resident of the neighborhood, implying that he <br />would pay her share. <br />Discussion ensued at length regarding the double frontage <br />51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.