Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 25 1955 BOOK <br />Commissioner Scurlock inquired about the total cost of the <br />proposed adjustments, and Administrator Wright stated that there <br />is actually no cost involved at this time. He is simply asking <br />for reclassification of paygrades at this point and then will <br />look at salaries. In some cases, there will be no increase. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0) <br />approved the reclassifications listed in the <br />Administrator's memo dated September 18, 1985. <br />DISCUSS FORFEITURE OF BOND - FISCHER MINING OPERATION <br />Director Keating reviewed staff memo, as follows: <br />TO: The Honorable Members DATE: September 19, 198f iLE: <br />of the Board of County <br />Commissioners <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: REQUEST TO REQUIRE <br />_ SUBJECT: FORFEITURE OF BOND FOR <br />r DR. HENRY FISCHER <br />MINING OPERATION <br />Robert M. Keating, CP <br />Planning & Development Director <br />FROM: REFERENCES: <br />Betty Davis H. Fischer <br />Code Enforcement Officer DIS:BETTY <br />It is requested that the following information be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their <br />regular meeting of September.25, 1985. <br />DESCRIPTION AND -CONDITIONS: <br />On April 9, 1981, the County Planning and Zoning Commission <br />approved an application submitted by Dr. Henry Fischer to mine <br />9 acres of an 18.43 acre parcel of agricultural zoned land <br />located north of County Road 512 and East of 101st Avenue in <br />Section 21, Township 31S, Range 39 East, Indian River Farms <br />Company Subdivision. At that time, the applicant, in <br />accordance with requirements of the County's mining ordinance, <br />tendered to Indian River County a bond of $10,000. The subject <br />bond was to ensure compliance with the approved site plan, with <br />forfeiture of the bond possible if the applicant failed to <br />comply with the site plan as approved, including restoration of <br />the site. <br />Although the County's mining ordinance does not delineate a <br />time frame within which a mining operation must be completed, <br />it does however, as stated in Section 25(r)(11) of the County's <br />Code of Laws and Ordinances, require a bond to be effective for <br />full coverage protection at all time during the entire period <br />of the operation. <br />75 <br />